Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Karl Oskar Sundfelt's avatar

I will never be able to understand why one level of organisation (state) is worse than one other (city). Some states, like mine Sweden, have less citizens than cities like Hong Kong or Los Angeles. Why is a hypothetical nationalistic Sweden a worse idea than a self-interested Hong Kong? Globalism in itself does not seem to make sense.

Expand full comment
Branson Edwards's avatar

OK, wow. I'll have to reread this many times, take notes,and otherwise use my brain more in additional readings. I agree with so much of it, but also have some big, fundamental objections. The first is the radical, overwhelming importance of energy, and access to energy, and all the other resources we need and use and rely on (all of which we also need lots of energy to utilize and benefit from). None of that energy and other resources are distributed equally, not even close, nor are they likely to be shared in an egalitarian manner, ever. I love cities, and I agree that local solutions are the best solutions, but most locales are not local to any of the resources societies, let alone civilization (in whatever form), needs to survive, let alone thrive and flourish as you suggest in your vision of the future, though (at least to my undereducated mind). I love it though. Please make it happen and invite me over. Happy new year from a happy subscriber.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts